Steadvar — News without the noise

Privacy · Terms · About

© 2026 Steadvar. All rights reserved.

Congress Moves to Ban Insider Betting on Prediction Markets

Politics3d ago
Share

Similar Articles

Senators Vote to Ban Themselves From Prediction Markets

Politics4/30/2026

Campaign Staffers Use Insider Poll Data to Profit on Prediction Markets

PoliticsBusiness5/7/2026

Congressional Hearing Examines Sports Betting Integrity and Prediction Markets

PoliticsBusiness1d ago

Prediction Market Kalshi Suspends Virginia Candidate for Betting on Himself

PoliticsBusiness5/1/2026

Minnesota Bans Prediction Market Sites, Setting First Statewide Prohibition

BusinessPolitics3d ago

Members of Congress are working to establish new rules banning insider betting on prediction markets, following alleged scandals involving classified information and unreleased polling data. The House is discussing a chamber-wide prohibition, with bipartisan leadership support, while the Senate has already enacted one. Multiple bills have been introduced to regulate these markets, though none have yet advanced toward becoming law.

Facts First

  • The Senate has issued a chamber-wide prohibition on staff and Senators buying event contracts.
  • House leadership is discussing a similar ban, with Speaker Mike Johnson and Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries supportive of the idea.
  • At least 10 proposed bills aim to regulate insider trading on prediction markets, including bans on bets related to campaigns, war, or deaths.
  • Recent scandals have prompted action, including charges against a U.S. soldier for using classified information to win over $400,000.
  • Current House ethics rules do not address prediction market bets, and there are no requirements to report these profits in financial disclosures.

What Happened

Following alleged insider trading scandals, members of Congress are attempting to establish new regulatory guardrails for online prediction markets. The Senate recently issued a chamber-wide prohibition on staff and Senators buying event contracts. In the House, Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters that a ban is being discussed and he would be in favor of it, though consensus is needed. Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries is also supportive, according to his spokeswoman. The House Oversight Committee has begun reviewing prediction market operations, and Chairman James Comer has started requesting information from exchanges, threatening subpoenas if it is not provided.

Why this Matters to You

If you participate in prediction markets, new rules may soon restrict what you can bet on and who can participate. Markets related to politics, campaigns, or military events could be prohibited, which may limit your investment options. For government employees and political campaign staffers, these changes could introduce new criminal penalties for using insider information, potentially affecting your career and financial security. The establishment of clearer rules and enforcement may also help ensure these markets operate more fairly for all participants.

What's Next

The House may move to align its rules with the Senate's existing prohibition. Speaker Johnson noted consensus is needed, but with bipartisan leadership support, a ban appears likely to be discussed further. The Congressional Research Service reports that more than a dozen regulatory bills have been introduced this year, but none have made meaningful progress toward becoming law; these proposals may now receive more attention. The House Oversight Committee's review could lead to subpoenas and further investigations into market operations. The Federal Election Commission (FEC) may be tasked with devising enforcement guidance if specific bills, like the Campaign Funds Integrity Act, advance.

Perspectives

“
Lawmakers argue that the current system is 'indefensible' and that members of Congress should be prohibited from profiting off prediction markets using insider knowledge to prevent the institution from appearing like a 'casino'.
“
Ethics Experts contend that the absence of regulatory guidance regarding prediction markets represents a dangerous 'blind spot' and that new laws are necessary to prevent 'nefarious bets' on sensitive political and military developments.
“
Policy Analysts observe that the legislative struggle to regulate prediction markets reflects a broader pattern of Congress failing to keep pace with emerging technologies like cryptocurrency and artificial intelligence.