Steadvar — News without the noise

Privacy · Terms · About

© 2026 Steadvar. All rights reserved.

Study Finds ICE Enforcement Reduced Employment for Some U.S.-Born Workers

EconomyPolitics5d ago
Share

Similar Articles

Federal Immigration Enforcement Accelerates Under New DHS Leadership

Politics4d ago

Trump Administration Shifts Immigration Messaging After Backlash

Politics4/17/2026

Republicans Advance $70 Billion Immigration Enforcement Bill with White House Security Funds

Politics5d ago

Minnesota Businesses and Families Seek Relief After Immigration Crackdown

PoliticsSociety6d ago

Federal Appeals Court Strikes Down Mandatory Detention Policy

Politics4d ago

A new economic study finds that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) activity during the Trump administration's second term had a negative impact on employment for U.S.-born men with a high school education or less in sectors like construction. The research suggests this was due to a reduction in overall labor demand, not a wage increase to attract domestic workers. The findings come amid a strong overall job market and ongoing debate about immigration's role in the labor force.

Facts First

  • ICE enforcement reduced employment for U.S.-born men with at most a high-school education in sectors like construction.
  • The study found no evidence that employers raised wages to attract U.S.-born workers, pointing instead to reduced overall demand.
  • In areas with an enforcement 'surge,' employment among likely undocumented workers still in the U.S. fell by 4% in likely affected jobs.
  • The research is described as the first to study the national labor market impacts of the Trump 2.0 ICE blitz.
  • The findings emerge alongside strong overall job market numbers, including a business hiring surge in March.

What Happened

A working paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research found that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) activity had a 'negative and significant impact' on the employment of U.S.-born working men with at most a high-school education. The affected sectors were those likely impacted by enforcement, such as construction. The research, conducted by University of Colorado Boulder associate professor Chloe East and research assistant Elizabeth Cox, found no evidence that employers increased wages to attract U.S.-born workers. Instead, the results reflect a reduction in overall labor demand. The University of Colorado Boulder noted that in areas hit with an enforcement 'surge,' there was a 4% decrease in employment among likely undocumented workers still in the U.S. in likely affected jobs.

Why this Matters to You

If you or someone you know works in industries like construction without a college degree, this research suggests that immigration enforcement policies could affect job availability in your sector by reducing overall demand for labor. For businesses in these sectors, the findings indicate that enforcement actions may shrink the available workforce without a corresponding increase in wages to compensate. For policymakers, the study provides data on a specific labor market consequence of immigration enforcement, which may inform future decisions.

What's Next

The study's findings may contribute to the ongoing national debate about immigration policy and its economic effects. The White House has stated that 'there is no shortage of American minds and hands to grow our labor force,' suggesting a continued focus on domestic workers. Further research could examine the long-term economic impacts of these labor market shifts. The contrast between these sector-specific findings and the strong overall job market may lead to more targeted policy discussions.

Perspectives

“
Economic Researchers suggest that immigration crackdowns do not expand job opportunities for American workers and may actually cause an employment drain for certain U.S.-born men.
“
Administration Supporters argue that the immigration agenda represents a commitment to capitalizing on untapped potential while fulfilling the mandate to enforce immigration laws.
“
Labor Analysts contend that deportations do not benefit U.S.-born workers because the two groups often fill 'complementary' roles rather than competing for the same jobs, and that labor disruptions in specific sectors are often masked by national data.
“
Academic Institutions suggest that the 'chilling effect' resulting from current immigration enforcement is more significant than what was observed during previous mass deportation efforts.