Senate Passes Homeland Security Funding After Marathon Session
Similar Articles
House Passes Homeland Security Funding, Ending Partial Shutdown
House and Senate Leaders Disagree on DHS Funding as Shutdown Enters 72nd Day
Republicans Advance $70 Billion Immigration Enforcement Bill with White House Security Funds
House to Vote on Surveillance, Farm, and Border Funding Before Recess
House Legislative Agenda Stalls as FISA Deadline Looms
The Senate passed a spending bill to reopen most of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) after a marathon voting session that concluded past 3:30 a.m. Democrats continue to block funding for specific immigration enforcement agencies, and the House has rejected the Senate's agreement.
Facts First
- The Senate passed a DHS spending bill via voice vote just past 2 a.m. after a marathon session.
- Funding for ICE and Border Patrol remains blocked by Democrats following recent protests.
- The House rejected the Senate's spending agreement citing insufficient funding for immigration enforcement.
- The Senate used budget reconciliation to fund two immigration enforcement agencies, bypassing the filibuster.
- The process included a 'vote-a-rama' allowing unlimited amendments during a session that lasted over 6 hours.
What Happened
A marathon voting session in the Senate concluded just past 3:30 a.m. on Wednesday following more than six hours of voting on amendments to a budget resolution. Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) passed the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) spending bill via voice vote just past 2 a.m. The bill funds the reopening of most of DHS, including the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). Democrats continue to block funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Border Patrol following the shootings of two protesters in Minneapolis.
Why this Matters to You
The passage of this bill means the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) are likely to resume normal operations, which could affect airport security and other federal services. However, the continued block on funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Border Patrol may lead to ongoing disputes over immigration enforcement policy. The House's rejection of the Senate agreement suggests further legislative negotiations are likely, which could delay final funding decisions.
What's Next
House lawmakers rejected the Senate's spending agreement after it was announced while they were asleep, citing a lack of funding for immigration enforcement agencies. This disagreement may lead to further negotiations or a revised bill. The Senate is currently using a process called budget reconciliation to fund two immigration enforcement agencies, which allows the majority to bypass the filibuster, suggesting partisan votes on these specific funds could continue.