Immigration Appeals Board Rules DACA Status Alone Not Enough to Avoid Deportation
Similar Articles
Appeals Court Blocks Trump-Era Asylum Suspension Order
Federal Appeals Court Strikes Down Mandatory Detention Policy
Supreme Court to Hear Challenges to TPS Terminations Affecting Hundreds of Thousands
Federal Immigration Enforcement Accelerates Under New DHS Leadership
Trump Administration Shifts Immigration Messaging After Backlash
The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) has issued a precedent decision stating that having Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) status is not sufficient grounds to terminate deportation proceedings. The ruling overturns an immigration judge's decision and sends a specific case back for review. This decision sets a binding precedent for how immigration judges nationwide interpret the protections offered by DACA.
Facts First
- The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) ruled that DACA status alone does not warrant relief from deportation
- The decision overturns an immigration judge's termination of proceedings for a DACA recipient and sends the case back for review
- The ruling sets a precedent for how immigration judges nationwide interpret DACA protections
- The BIA sided with Department of Homeland Security (DHS) lawyers in the appeal
- An NPR analysis found BIA decisions backed government lawyers in 97% of publicly posted cases last year
What Happened
The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) published a new precedent decision stating that being a recipient of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program is not sufficient reason to provide relief from deportation. A three-judge panel sided with Department of Homeland Security (DHS) lawyers in an appeal against immigration judge Michael Pleters. Judge Pleters had previously terminated removal proceedings for Catalina 'Xóchitl' Santiago, citing her active DACA status. The BIA sent Santiago's case back to a different immigration judge for review, ruling the judge erred by basing his decision solely on Santiago's DACA status.
Why this Matters to You
This decision directly affects the legal standing of approximately 500,000 DACA recipients. If you or someone you know has DACA status, this ruling clarifies that the program's temporary protection does not automatically shield you from deportation proceedings. The precedent means immigration judges across the country must now follow this interpretation, which could lead to more DACA recipients facing removal cases. Government data shows that between January and November of last year, 261 DACA recipients were arrested and 86 were removed. The ruling may also influence broader immigration policy debates and the stability of the DACA program itself.
What's Next
Catalina Santiago's case will be reviewed by a different immigration judge. The BIA's decision is now binding precedent, meaning future cases involving DACA recipients will be adjudicated under this new standard. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has previously urged DACA recipients to self-deport and argued the program does not equate to automatic legal status, a position this ruling appears to support. Ongoing attempts by the second Trump administration to strip DACA recipients of benefits suggest DACA protections could face further challenges. Whether active DACA recipients are at widespread risk of removal remains an open question; DHS did not respond to an immediate request for comment on this point.