Steadvar — News without the noise

Privacy · Terms · About

© 2026 Steadvar. All rights reserved.

ICE Spyware Contract with Paragon Solutions Ended in January

PoliticsCrimeTechnology5/22/2026
Share

Similar Articles

ICE Acknowledges Use of Spyware for Counterterrorism and Drug Investigations

PoliticsCrime5/19/2026

Palantir Faces Internal Scrutiny Over ICE and Military Contracts

BusinessTechnology4/25/2026

DHS Expands Iris Scanning Technology for Immigration Enforcement

PoliticsTechnology3d ago

DOJ Files Suits Against Four States Over ICE Undercover License Plate Policies

PoliticsCrime1d ago

ICE in Talks to Purchase Turnkey Detention Facilities from Private Vendors

PoliticsSociety5/7/2026

A contract between Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and spyware maker Paragon Solutions was closed out in January. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) states ICE has no current contract or relationship with Paragon or its acquirer. The contract had been reactivated last year but was previously paused by the Biden administration for a security review.

Facts First

  • ICE's contract with spyware firm Paragon Solutions was closed out on Jan. 20, according to a federal procurement website.
  • The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) states ICE has no current contract or relationship with Paragon Solutions, Inc. or the company that acquired it.
  • The Biden administration paused the 2024 contract to review compliance with an executive order barring risky commercial spyware.
  • The contract was reactivated under the Trump administration last August before being closed this year.
  • Paragon's Graphite spyware has been used to target journalists and activists in various countries, according to researchers and prosecutors.

What Happened

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) reactivated a previously paused contract with spyware maker Paragon Solutions last year. The Biden administration had placed the 2024 contract on hold to determine if it complied with a 2023 executive order barring federal agencies from purchasing commercial spyware that poses significant security risks. A notice on a federal procurement website states the Paragon Solutions contract was closed out on Jan. 20. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) stated to NPR that ICE has no current contract or relationship with Paragon Solutions, Inc. or the company that acquired them.

Why this Matters to You

This story involves the tools and methods used by federal law enforcement, which could impact the privacy and security standards governing surveillance. The use of powerful commercial spyware, like Paragon's Graphite tool which can access encrypted messages without a target's interaction, raises significant questions about oversight and potential for misuse. You may be affected by how these tools are regulated and against whom they are authorized, as past use of Graphite has targeted journalists and activists abroad.

What's Next

DHS declined to clarify if ICE still has access to Paragon-developed tools through a third party and would not answer whether ICE is using a different spyware vendor. In an April 1 letter, departing acting ICE Director Todd Lyons acknowledged he approved the Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) team to use a commercial spyware tool to disrupt foreign terrorist organizations and fentanyl traffickers, certifying it complied with the 2023 executive order. The future of ICE's spyware capabilities may depend on ongoing internal reviews and the application of the executive order's safeguards.

Perspectives

“
Democratic Lawmakers demand transparency from the DHS regarding the reactivation of the Paragon Solutions contract and whether ICE's use of spyware adheres to a 2023 executive order.
“
Privacy and Civil Liberties Advocates express alarm over the expanding surveillance capabilities used by ICE to monitor immigrants and protesters, viewing current agency statements as 'a half measure and a red herring.'
“
Legal Experts remain skeptical of the agency's vague communications, noting that 'vaguely worded non-association statements' do not provide sufficient clarity on whether ICE maintains access to surveillance tools.